Main Content
Link to Michigan State University Home Page
Infrastructure Planning and Facilities IPF Home
  • IPF Home
  • Mission
  • FAQ
  • Service guide
  • Contacts

Overview

Purpose

Timeline

Talking Points

Meeting Highlights

Process

Focus Groups

Feedback

Suggestions

  • IPF Home
  •  »  The MSU Way: Excellence in Campus Operations and Services
  •  »  ECOS Feedback
  •  »  Suggestions by category
  •  » Suggestions by category: Organization/Efficiency

Suggestions by category: Organization/Efficiency

Suggestions in order received | Suggestions by category | Return to MSU Way

Suggestions welcome

Feedback can reach the MSU Way: ECOS steering committee through the online suggestion box. Please feel free to submit your ideas to us either anonymously or with an identifier. All suggestions will be posted as anonymous even if an identifier is given.

 

 

Suggestion 4

Work that can be planned, but is not, will present itself as urgent. The now-urgent work reroutes materials/labor/concentration and will almost always result in higher costs and inefficiencies. It will tend to undervalue the ideas and planning that are usually done and that do improve services and save money.

Suggestion 5

How are we improving processes every day? What are the measurables and/or improvements that can be shared inside and beyond the Physical Plant that are examples of the good work that we do? Best practices can lead to more ideas for still more improvement.

Suggestion 7

The Public Art on Campus Committee (PAOCC) should be intentionally included in all capital projects.

Suggestion 9

Clarify roles for reducing trash adjacent to the buildings (Physical Plant Landscape Services or individual building facilities).

Suggestion 10

Reduce the number of separate service requests (which lead to performance gaps) that need to be sent to separate Physical Plant departments to get non-capital project work done efficiently.

Suggestion 12

Use project charters or equivalent for all projects, both capital and non-capital, so that roles are clearly defined for all team members and customers know who to go to for a specific task.

Suggestion 15

Clarify roles and decision-making authority for all employees involved in construction, renovation and refurbishment.

Suggestion 21

Create realistic project commitment logs and hold team members accountable to said logs.

Suggestion 24

Collaborate to use technology to increase productivity.

Suggestion 26

Clarify roles and value of project managers: MSU architect project manager, contracted architect project manager, Physical Plant project manager, Physical Plant site managers, Residential and Hospitality Services (RHS) project manager, RHS Interior Design project manager, RHS planner/inspector/analyst, RHS facility manager.

More Results:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next »
  • IPF Home
  • Mission
  • FAQ
  • Service guide
  • Contacts
©2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees.
MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer.
East Lansing MI 48824